Tour of the Electromagnetic Spectrum (NASA, 2010)

So much of my career in high-tech dealt with harnessing the electromagnetic spectrum for various uses to include communications, telemetry, radar, navigation, tracking, machine vision, and precision measurement to name a few.  Fortunate to have worked with great minds in signal processing, I spent over two decades in industries ranging from electronic warfare, satellite communications, cellular, GPS, surveying and mapping, fleet management and automatic vehicle location, telematics, E911, and location-based services.

Today, more so than ever in our history, each of us is bombarded with natural, and human-made, electromagnetic waves, most having their roots in the simple trigonometric function: sin x.

Enjoy this brief introductory video about the electromagnetic spectrum as we know it.  There are seven follow-on videos, all produced by NASA, and no longer than five minutes or so, that go into more detail on different bands in the electromagnetic spectrum.


Fortunately, we do not need to explore the electromagnetic spectrum as I needed to in my fields and waves coursework via Maxwell’s equations.

Maxwell's Equations

Maxwell's Equations 1

Maxwell's Equations 2


Maxwell's Equations 3

Maxwell's Equations 4


About Dave aka Mr. Math Teacher

Secondary math teacher teaching math intervention, algebra 1, honors precalculus, and AP Calculus AB. I spent 25 years in high tech in engineering, marketing, sales and business development roles in the satellite communications, GPS, semiconductor, and wireless industries. I am awed by the potential in our nation's youth and I hope to instill in them the passion to improve our world at local, state, national, and global levels.
This entry was posted in History, Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Tour of the Electromagnetic Spectrum (NASA, 2010)

  1. Jim says:

    The antiquated symbolism in which the equations of electromagnetism continue to be expressed is a depressing example of historical inertia. My God, the exterior calculus goes all the way back to Volterra!


  2. Jim says:

    The traditional notation for differential calculus in three dimensions is a mess. It depends on an identification of different components of the exterior algebra in three dimensions because they happen to have the same dimensions. But these components should be carefully kept apart since they are not canonically isomorphic. It also confuses vectors with covectors. It happens that in three dimensions one can reduce everything to three dimensional vector spaces but this relies on isomorphisms dependent on the arbitrary choice of an inner product and an orientation.

    The price of any computational advantage here is conceptual confusion. In dimension n where n is
    greater than 3 it is no longer possible to reduce everything to n dimensional vector spaces.


  3. Jim says:

    What particularly annoys me about some of the above posters is that they seem to take a delight in producing mystification and confusion. The traditional notation of multivariable differential calculus in which Maxwell’s Equations are often written almost seems to have been deliberately designed to create the maximum obscurity and opacity. It’s no wonder that students sometimes approach it as an exercise in memorizing wallpaper.


  4. JIm says:

    I meant to say “in memorizing wallpaper patterns”. I,m upset.


  5. Sorry to hear you’re upset, Jim.

    How would you represent those four equations so they are more understandable? I might even post it for you in contrast to those above.

    For me, the two black & white posters are a means of poking fun at a very difficult course, which I’m sure was the case for many of my EE brethren (and sistren).

    The whole issue of memorizing versus understanding spans nearly all of mathematics, and is a byproduct of forcing the learning of fixed curricula into time-specific periods. This dilemma impacts nearly all students regardless of where they reside in the universe of mathematics.


  6. JIm says:

    There are many excellent works on multivariable calculus whose authors try to explain as clearly as possible what is going on. The difficulty of some works has more to do with the horrible traditional notation used than anything inherent in the subject.


  7. JIm says:

    Rather than celebrating the befuddlement induced by the traditional notation of nineteenth century vector analysis we should discard it into the ashcan of history as rapidly as possible.


  8. Jim says:

    Let me mention that I have the greatest respect for the 19th century scientists you mentioned in your comment. They had no idea what they were doing but that’s OK. They were pioneers and they weren’t supposed to know what they were doing. But we shouldn’t perpetuate their confused notation.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s