Girls Outperforming Boys in Honors Precalculus

Stunned by the rumors flying around select households in my school’s local neighborhoods, I reached out through a parent intermediary earlier this semester to meet with parent representatives in hopes of quelling the raging tornado of troubles.  The meeting went well, parties felt heard, and I gleaned deeper insight into parental concerns.

One of the concerns centered on gender, which was surprising in some aspects, and enlightening in others.  Surprising, in that I very much strive to be gender neutral in my outlook and expectations for student achievement.  Yet select parents of daughters felt that I did not know how best to teach their daughters; I presume their position derived from their daughters’ perceptions of my classroom management where I admonish students for talking when I am lecturing, which is infrequent as a percentage of classroom time. Ironically, another complaint vector centers on my use of the flipped classroom where students engage with the content and attempt homework before I lecture on the topic.  Much of classroom time consists of students working together in groups to complete homework exercises so they may present them to the class.  Yet, when I do provide direct instruction in class, some students do not take the opportunity to listen intently; ergo, the discipline, and the perception of meanness, which grew with every behavioral intervention.

While I recognize the emotional, social, and behavioral distinctions among my students, they rarely were a factor in my classroom until I started teaching honors precalculus this year.  Suddenly one or two students were crying during and after assessments, especially if they felt as if they did not score exceedingly well.  During discussions with coworkers, I learned of an extremely cohesive group of sophomore girls who seemed to serve as the central nervous system for my sophomore students, with the emphasis on nerves.  As they rarely experienced truly challenging work in prior mathematics courses, even not so challenging word problems from my perspective, they reeled at my expectations.  When they reeled, I suffered as I felt the time-delayed anger of their parents via complaints to my assistant principal of instruction (API).  Like the phases of the moon, when unit tests, or challenging quizzes loomed, student worries grew until they burst outwards via tears and group hugs.  None of the assessments phased my male students, or even junior or senior girls.  Yet, they harkened gloom for the sophomore girls.

Recent Unit Assessment Outcomes

Test Scores by Gender - Top 25

Notwithstanding the emotional roller coaster, for me as well as for certain sophomore girls, their scores on the assessments typically were quite high, and disproportionate to their representation in my course.  In fact, over time, it became clear that I needed to mine my assessment data to see how differing segments of students fared.  As I analyzed the data, developing statistics, I noticed that, on average, girls were outperforming boys in my honors precalculus course.  The data in the table support this statement.  It is from a recent test that included conic sections and limits, an interesting amalgam for sure.  As one can see, more girls than boys scored in the top ten by a 60% – 40% split, which contrasts with their 46% – 54% representation split in the course.

Semester 1 Outcomes

When comparing outcomes from first semester, as measured by letter grades (A through F), girls disproportionately scored higher than boys as the  figures below reveal.

Letter Grade Breakdown by Gender - All

This figure contrasts the representation of female students in three sections of the course at 46% with the 52% of A grades and 49% of B grades awarded to female students.

Letter Grade Breakdown by P6 Females

This figure zeros in on my sixth period where female students represent twenty percent of the three section student population, yet received thirty-three percent of A letter grades and twenty-three percent of B letter grades; no sixth period female student received lower than a B- in the course first semester.

Letter Grade Breakdown by P6 Gender

This last figure shows that while female students in sixth period represented fifty-two percent of students in sixth period, sixty-four percent of them received an A in the course while 48% received a B.

Girls certainly have more hurdles than boys when it comes to achieving in mathematics, as noted in the OECD’s 2015 report: The ABC of Gender
Equality in Education – Aptitude, Behaviour, Confidence, developed from PISA 2012 results.  However, I will do everything in my power to ensure they are supported in my classroom, and achieve at their highest potential.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Brothers from Another Mother: Management Fads and Educational Policies

Dave aka Mr. Math Teacher:

Reblogging a post from last summer…

Originally posted on Reflections of a Second-career Math Teacher:

A comment I made earlier today on Larry Cuban’s recent blog post titled Asking the Right Questions for Getting School-Driven Policies into Classroom Practice sparked the following post.


Since early 2009, when I started to pursue my new career in teaching, the many parallels between corporate America’s litany of management fads over the past three plus decades and public education’s policy-driven teaching methods and resources over a similar timeframe started to coalesce in my mind.

Our susceptibility to fads may not necessarily be an impediment to progress, as elements of each likely benefit select entities in meaningful ways, or apply more broadly in certain circumstances, likely very limited in duration.  However, an elitist or autocratic implementation, whether cloaked in sheep’s clothing or not, such as the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) depicted as a state-driven effort, never seems to succeed over time or to be sustainable, especially when presented in a “lock, stock, and barrel”…

View original 1,150 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Breakfast Club, Literally

Two weeks ago, I served my third session supervising Saturday school detention.  When I arrived, the other two teachers and I separated students into three groups.  In my past two sessions, my group consisted primarily of juniors, both male and female.  This time, one group of freshman, sophomores, and juniors filled up one teacher’s classroom leaving sixty plus seniors between the other teacher and myself.  He asked me if I was OK splitting the remaining students along gender lines, to which I replied yes.  For some reason, I requested the boys, and a testosterone laden morning followed.

Upon arriving in my classroom, taking role, and queuing up a DVD movie: Narnia, boys started asking if they could order food for delivery to the school.  When teaching, I never allow something as absurd as students ordering food to eat in class, except for Pizza Pi Day recently, or when offering after-school SAT prep, or similar late, into the evening; brains need fuel.  However, supervising Saturday school provided the opportunity to explore student behavior on the edge of standard expectations, for students and for me.

Hence, Mr. Math Teacher proceeded where he never ventured before, and perhaps few other teachers.  I permitted students to phone in orders for breakfast skillets, pancakes, and scrambles from local eateries.  Fortunately, I knew a few of the more popular and influential athletes, which helped keep behavior in check much of the morning while food deliveries started flowing into my classroom.  In some ways, I am not sure who was more surprised I consented to their requests, the boys or me!

As Ferris Bueller opined: “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.”

Bueller - Life moves pretty fast...

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments